User talk:Lee Vilenski
![]() | Projects can be found here. Currently working on updating all events on the 2019–20 snooker season up to GA status! You can help! |
Most recent poster here: Lee Vilenski (talk)
Content requiring reviews!
FAC(s)[edit]
FLC(s)[edit]
Good Topics[edit]
GAN(s)[edit]
- Food Wars!: Shokugeki no Soma (nom)
- Cribbage (pool) (start)
- Honolulu (pool) (start)
- 1970 World Snooker Championship (start)
- 2011 World Snooker Championship (start)
- 2022 Welsh Open (snooker) (nom)
- 2022 World Snooker Championship (start)
- Survivor: Africa (start)
Service Award
|
---|
![]() This editor is a Senior Editor II and is entitled to display this Rhodium Editor Star. Senior Editor II service award.
Currently, this editor has earned the To get to the next level, Senior Editor III, he needs to meet the time requirement. Progress towards the next level (by time): [ 49.4 days / 182.6 days ]27.1% completed |
ITN recognition for 2022 World Snooker Championship[edit]
![]() | On 3 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 World Snooker Championship, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 00:50, 3 May 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
I am so impressed to see this in the news, right after the day with the 2021 World Snooker Championship for TFA and 1977 World Snooker Championship for DYK! - I have the quirky today, which is rare ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:00, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda Arendt! can't take any credit for the DYK though. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- sometimes nice coincidences happen, planned and unplanned - today performances in Ukraine - for Ukraine - for peace, at the bottom an imaginary set of eight DYK - and more May pics--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks Gerda Arendt! can't take any credit for the DYK though. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2009 European Team Championships on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mestizos in the United States[edit]
Hi, just so you know, I looked at the article and the subject in question and had commented my opinion (justified a delete) in the AfD page linked. 0xDeadbeef (T C) 13:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Peripatetic groups of Afghanistan on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Question from GlendaGDWN (20:17, 14 May 2022)[edit]
Dear Mentor, I recently updated the "Nina Menkes" page with valid information, and all my edits were revised. Can you help with this? Im so frustrated. I wanted to do more edits but now Im just discouraged.. thank you -G.G. --GlendaGDWN (talk) 20:17, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi GlendaGDWN - I'd love to help, but talk:Nina Menkes is a better location for this. Justlettersandnumbers reverted your changes on the page mostly due to the sources you were using not being reliable. Something being valid doesn't mean its suitable for us to include. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:56, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- GlendaGDWN, please don't be discouraged! Unfortunately that page has a very long history of inappropriate editing by people apparently connected to, or paid by, the subject. May I gently suggest that you choose a less contentious page to improve? Or that you mention on the talk-page the errors or omissions that you see in it? Thanks! (oh, and hi, Lee V!). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi! Hope you are well! Apologies for the ping, but easier than explaining the individual sources. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 09:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- GlendaGDWN, please don't be discouraged! Unfortunately that page has a very long history of inappropriate editing by people apparently connected to, or paid by, the subject. May I gently suggest that you choose a less contentious page to improve? Or that you mention on the talk-page the errors or omissions that you see in it? Thanks! (oh, and hi, Lee V!). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:44, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:24, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Promotion of Snooker world rankings 2018/2019[edit]
![]() | Congratulations, Lee Vilenski! The list you nominated, Snooker world rankings 2018/2019, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Giants2008 (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC) |
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Survivor: Africa[edit]
Hello Lee Vilenski. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Survivor: Africa at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC) |
- Hi Lee, re your request, I've copy-editing only – GOCE is not CLEANUP. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:29, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Award[edit]
![]() |
Four Award | |
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on 2021 Tour Championship. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC) |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:26, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Aleksandr Dvornikov on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Slosh (cue sport)[edit]
![]() | On 21 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Slosh (cue sport), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the game of slosh shares the name with a English batter and sausage dish? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Slosh (cue sport). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Slosh (cue sport)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:27, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Slosh (cue sport)[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Slosh (cue sport) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 09:21, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Slosh (cue sport)[edit]
The article Slosh (cue sport) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Slosh (cue sport) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 10:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
The Wall Street Journal RFC[edit]
Hi,
I know that you are going to close this, but I added another example of canvassing to the discussion. I know I should have done it sooner. Apologies if this causes more disruption. I have no intention to continue that discussion on the talk page. Politrukki (talk) 10:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Politrukki - thanks for letting me know. That particular RFC had a real issue with it being spread across many different pages (such as the ones you outlined, previous discussions, and the AN thread). Whilst the above isn't suitable (I'd argue it's also forum shopping), I don't think it broke the validity of the RfC. I hope the closure is treated well, I took quite a while reading through all of the discussions. This sort of thing is best dealt with at the time, rather than to sway the closure of the topic. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, Lee. Did you miss that the version with the disputed phrase is the longstanding text? Normally no consensus means restore the status quo, so the correct close would "no consensus to remove" the disputed phrase.—S Marshall T/C 21:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- S Marshall Apologies if it wasn't clear! No consensus means no consensus. As you say, in practice this means to retain the information that was present before the RFC. However, the RFC was written in such a way that it wasn't asking if the information should be removed, simply if it was suitable for the lede (probably a poorly worded RFC). There isn't a consensus to remove, as you say, but there also isn't a consensus to keep. The close, practically means to retain the status quo, but doesn't condemn or approve the text. I don't personally like the phrase "no consensus to remove" as it suggests there is a consensus to keep. I hope I've explained that well enough, but happy to look at the exact wording if it's deemed confusing! Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- whoops, forgot to ping S Marshall Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:44, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
- S Marshall Apologies if it wasn't clear! No consensus means no consensus. As you say, in practice this means to retain the information that was present before the RFC. However, the RFC was written in such a way that it wasn't asking if the information should be removed, simply if it was suitable for the lede (probably a poorly worded RFC). There isn't a consensus to remove, as you say, but there also isn't a consensus to keep. The close, practically means to retain the status quo, but doesn't condemn or approve the text. I don't personally like the phrase "no consensus to remove" as it suggests there is a consensus to keep. I hope I've explained that well enough, but happy to look at the exact wording if it's deemed confusing! Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 21:43, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
The Closer's Barnstar[edit]
unnoticed. Please accept this token of appreciation for your excellent work. Atsme 💬 📧 23:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC) |
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Red link on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 05:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Slosh (cue sport)[edit]
The article Slosh (cue sport) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Slosh (cue sport) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tim riley -- Tim riley (talk) 15:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Done Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2022 Welsh Open (snooker)[edit]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2022 Welsh Open (snooker) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022[edit]
Hello Lee Vilenski,
At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.
Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.
In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 714 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 1041 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.
This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}}
on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Question from Deepesh kafalatiya on Honda WR-V (04:12, 25 May 2022)[edit]
Hello guys I have an question for you Who is the best captain Virat kohli or MS Dhoni --Deepesh kafalatiya (talk) 04:12, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Deepesh kafalatiya - I'm not sure I understand your question. Have you got any questions on how to edit Wikipedia? Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Question from Daramola William on Un-Dam the Klamath (16:49, 25 May 2022)[edit]
Hello I need gift Card now --Daramola William (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Daramola William - I'm not sure I understand your question. Have you got any questions on how to edit Wikipedia? Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)